- Mac iphoto vs photos update#
- Mac iphoto vs photos pro#
- Mac iphoto vs photos professional#
- Mac iphoto vs photos mac#
Sorry, Aperture users who were able to turn the Faces feature off: it’s on in Photos. The Faces feature also comes across, only in Photos it appears as a special album in the Albums view. (The first time you convert a library, you’ll notice some lag as the initial thumbs are built.) Photos seems to handle thumbnails internally better than its predecessors. The application switches to very low-resolution thumbnails when scrolling quickly, and photos pop when you view them solo.
Mac iphoto vs photos mac#
Even on an older Mac (my main machine is still a 2010 MacBook Pro), Photos is speedy and responsive. Perhaps the best news is that Photos feels fast. And if you click any of these images, you can see it by itself. …and Years are divided into Collections by location and date.Ĭlick a Collection to split it into Moments. In Years view your thumbnails are so tiny, so you click to drill down… Views are broken out into a sort of “zooming” hierarchy that increases the size of the image thumbnails as you drill down: Years, Collections, Moments, and individual photos, which you switch using the unmarked arrows in the upper-left corner of the window or by clicking photos in the views. Photos appear in chronological order, with the most recent images at the bottom of the list (and no option to sort in reverse chronological order). If, however, you’ve ignored Apple’s devices lately, here’s a quick overview of how you navigate the interface. Look familiar? The interface resembles Photos for iOS, shown here on iPad (left) and iPhone. The interface is patterned after the mobile version of Photos.
If you own an iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch with iOS 7 or iOS 8, Photos for OS X will be immediately familiar.
Mac iphoto vs photos update#
At this stage of development, main features are nailed down and showstopper bugs are usually sorted out, but if anything changes between the beta and the shipping release, I’ll update the article. Aperture and iPhoto continue to work under Yosemite, but they’re no longer being updated.Īlso note that this review is based on the latest developer beta versions of Photos for OS X and OS X Yosemite 10.10.3.
Mac iphoto vs photos professional#
If you’re a photo professional or enthusiast whose workflow revolves around Aperture, you’ll want to stick with it for as long as you can, with an eye toward switching to another application like Adobe Lightroom at some point. If you’ve only scratched the surface of Aperture’s tools, then you can probably expect a smooth transition. It’s a simple idea, but tough to pull off.Īll that said, I’ll offer one spoiler up front: Photos is not an Aperture replacement, even though it can open Aperture libraries.
With iCloud Photo Library, Apple is attempting to make all of your photos-not just the ones you capture with any one device-available on every Apple product you own.Īll your photos, everywhere. Apple hasn’t been simply creating a new photo application for the Mac-this is the Mac component of the company’s grand photography effort that connects the iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, Apple TV, Apple Watch, and the Web. Photos for OS X handles them with varying levels of success, but it also stretches to take on another, more ambitious task. (Sharing photos, uploading to social media, and ordering prints are also important, but I don’t cover those features in this review.) The new version of the operating system is required, since Photos takes advantage of a new system framework to function.Ī modern photo library application has two jobs: organize the photos you add to the library so you can locate them easily, and edit photos to make corrections or change their appearance.
Photos for OS X is available now as part of the OS X Yosemite 10.10.3 update.
Mac iphoto vs photos pro#
Would it be friendly enough for casual users but also include the depth to satisfy Aperture’s professional photographers? Would it be like a few other notable Apple software rewrites, like iMovie and Final Cut Pro X, that took bold steps forward at the expense of stripping away features and alienating users? For most of the intervening 10 months-a long lead time for a company that prefers to ship software soon after announcing it-we didn’t know the new application’s capabilities. Last June, Apple announced the impending retirement of iPhoto and Aperture in favor of Photos for OS X, a new application it demonstrated briefly at the Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC).
0 kommentar(er)
